Chapter Two
The Philosophical Underpinnings of FAMILY
Rules
All existing systems of
parenting have philosophical underpinnings as their foundation.
This is the driving force behind what makes any parenting system
work - if
it works. Likewise, FAMILY Rules has
philosophical underpinnings that make the parenting discipline
system work in the home. Many parents lack any kind of a
parenting philosophy in their home other than relying on
thoughts and feelings once experienced in childhood: “When I’m a
parent, I’m not going to raise my kids the way my parents raised
me!” Unlike most other
parenting systems, FAMILY Rules provides
you with more than just philosophical underpinnings for raising
your children in the real world. Instead, FAMILY Rules also
provides parents with specific steps to implement the philosophy
while still allowing parents the opportunity to incorporate
their own unique values and morals. The remainder of this
chapter will identify and explain the philosophical
underpinnings of FAMILY Rules.
1. The “real world” is ordered and
structured and the lack of order and structure results in chaos.
You will find some form of order and structure most everywhere
you go on the earth. These important variables make the world
turn. Without order and structure, we wouldn’t know where to go
or what to do next. How would we prioritize our goals without
knowing the objectives and mission statement? How are decisions
to be made? We all can’t be the head. Someone has to be the
arms, hands, legs, and feet. Someone has to clean the mess at
the bottom and take out the trash. All positions are equally
important in making order and structure work. Whether we are
talking about various international organizations such as the
United Nations, NATO or OPEC; or national governments such as
the United States, Russia, or China; or State governments such
as New York, Texas, or California; or local governments such as
the city assembly, mayor’s office, or the school board; or grass
roots groups such as MADD, Guardian Angels, or NAACP; or private
groups such as churches, synagogues, the Rotary Club, or Boy
Scouts, organization and structure are the bones that hold
everything together. Without order and structure, we would all
be like lost sheep without a shepherd. We would all be wandering
around in the wilderness without purpose or direction. As a
result, chaos would ensue like in Cambodia, Somalia, Bosnia,
Kosovo, East Timor, and New Orleans, Louisiana after hurricane
Katrina hit.
Can you imagine being lucky enough to win two front row tickets
on the fifty yard line to watch the Super Bowl? The
top two NFL teams are playing for the championship. You arrive
at the stadium with your child and there are no lines, just
masses of people swarming around the entire sports
complex trying to get
inside. You see people pushing and shoving while others are
yelling obscenities at the gatekeepers. It takes several hours
just to get inside. You are a little troubled by the lack of
organization at the gates, but you’ll manage, because you are at
the Super Bowl for free
and you have the best seats in the house! You walk down toward
your seats and stop in your tracks as you observe two
individuals attempting to obtain their seats next to where
your seats are located. There is an intoxicated mob of strong
men, World Wrestling Federation material, with painted faces
that grab the two individuals and throw them over the railing to
the ground below. You contact the stadium security to inform
them about what you just witnessed as well as your desire to
obtain your prized seats. The stadium chief security officer
laughs at you. He says, “It’s first
come first served, Mac! Go find some empty seats!” Suddenly, you
realize that you won’t be watching the game from the best two
seats in the stadium.
You’re finally seated in the last two open seats at the top of
the stadium behind one of the goal posts, when the coin toss
occurs. The captains of the team calling the coin toss didn’t
guess right and decide to beat up the officials. The sidelines
clear and a brawl ensues.
It takes an hour to get both teams back to their sidelines, and
the injured players off
the field. While waiting, you talk with the one-eyed guy in the
seat next to yours. You
know, the guy with a
patch over his eye and a scar across the front of his neck.
After some discussion, you learn that he acquired his ticket for
this game from an old lady he beat up outside the stadium. He
also explains how he lost his eye and got the scar at the last
two Super Bowls.
The team finally kicks off and the other team receives the ball.
You notice that there are no officials on the field and the
clock is not running. The players are throwing the ball back and
forth and running anywhere they want to, on and off the field.
No one is listening to their coach. After ten more minutes of
observation, you quietly exit the stadium because you and your
child want to leave alive and unharmed. You have had enough of
chaos. Organization and structure would have made your Super
Bowl experience much more enjoyable. Fortunately for football
fans, the Super Bowl is run with a high degree of
professionalism, organization and structure. Most of us have
noticed this fact over the years from the best seats in the
house - on the couch at home, strategically located near the
kitchen and bathroom. These seats are cheap and we won’t miss
the Super Bowl commercials.
2. A hierarchy of authority and a healthy
respect for it is a vital part of making order and structure
work effectively.
Once again, everywhere you go on the earth, you will find
evidence of the necessity of order and structure. As previously
stated, someone has to be the head. Too many chefs in the
kitchen can ruin a good meal. Every church has a pastor or
priest. Every synagogue has a rabbi. Every school has a
principal. Every city has a mayor. Every state has a governor.
Every country has a prime minister, king, president or dictator.
A healthy respect for those in authority is definitely a vital
part of making order and structure work effectively.
Now imagine your child attending a middle school or high school
where the students lack a healthy respect for and compliance to
their teachers’ and principal’s authority. The students attend
class when they want, fight in the hallways, bring weapons to
school, buy and sell drugs on campus, curse at the teachers, and
dress offensively without much, if any, consideration for the
consequences. Imagine that you want your child to learn in a
safe, organized and structured environment, but the school
authorities fear implementing consequences. They fear being sued
by litigious, irresponsible parents who are more interested in
gaining a quick dollar than they are in having their children
learn anything at all, especially respect and responsibility.
You also learn that
the school authorities fear taking a stance because their own
school board may not back them up due to the very same fear of
possible litigation. As a result, imagine yourself placing your
child in a private school or charter school setting where the
tolerance level for inappropriate behaviors is much lower and
the teachers are supported by their administrators and parents.
A civil suit is the last thing on their mind. Teaching children
“the three R’s” is the primary focus. Finally, everyone knows
that the child will receive consequences at school and at home
for breaking the rules, especially for being disrespectful
toward authority figures. Imagine that! Parents, teachers and
administrators working together, clearly communicating, can
foster a healthy respect for authority in the students at home,
school and the community.
Please do not mistake the above paragraph as an endorsement of
private or charter schools over public schools. I
bee edjumakated en dee publik skoolz. I
am very happy with the public education I received at
Morningside Elementary School, Leslie Middle School, and South
Salem High School in Salem, Oregon. I’m pleased with the public
education I received at the University of Alaska at Anchorage as
well as at Rutgers University in New Jersey. Finally, I’m
pleased with the private education I received at George Fox
University in Newberg, Oregon. My oldest son has attended both
private and public schools. I have been pleased with both
learning environments. At present, all four of my children
attend public schools and universities. There are pros and
cons to both settings. Nevertheless, regardless of the setting,
if students lack a healthy respect for authority at school, none
of us as parents will be pleased with their learning
environment. Most parents would perceive such a disorderly
school setting as being poorly structured and ineffective in
addressing our children’s educational needs. We can all work
together to improve our children’s respect for the authority,
organization, and structure in both public and private
educational settings.
3. Authority flows downward; however,
without checks, balances, and feedback there is an increased
risk of developing an absolute dictatorship (i.e., Absolute
power corrupts - ask Adolph Hitler).
The vice-president doesn’t tell the president what to do. The
employee doesn’t tell the employer what to do. The defendant
doesn’t tell the judge what to do. Finally, a child does not
tell a parent what to do. It is a well known fact around the
world that authority flows downward. Our
own forefathers knew the risk they
were taking when they
defied the King of England and his Redcoats army. The
Confederates knew the risk they
were taking when they
took on President Abraham Lincoln
and the Yankee soldiers. There is power behind authority. Right
or wrong, it is this power that makes authority effective.
However, absolute power corrupts. It is important for people in
positions of authority to be open to feedback from those lower
on the totem pole of hierarchy. Otherwise, they will become an
absolute dictatorship and develop major blind spots to the error
of their ways.
Adolph Hitler was destined for leadership. Initially, he wanted
to study in seminary and become a man of the cloth. He had a
strong desire to lead others down what
he perceived to be a righteous path. Unfortunately, instead of
seminary, the doors for the military, and eventually politics,
opened up. He was not open to feedback from those serving
directly underneath him. His absolute power, his self-perceived
righteousness, and his unwillingness to listen to those serving
below him eventually corrupted his own heart and mind in
addition to the many Germans who
blindly followed him. As a result, some of Hitler’s own soldiers tried
to assassinate him without success (i.e.,
Operation Valkyrie). He
was bound and determined to demonstrate the dominance of a white
Aryan nation. Fortunately, Jessie Owens, an African-American,
rained on Hitler’s racist parade during the Olympics in Munich,
Germany. Jessie Owens outran Hitler’s best athletes and took the
gold medal back to the United States. Unfortunately, Hitler’s
leadership abilities were used to murder millions of men, women,
and children. You know how the story ends. The Americans and
Russians closed in on Berlin and Hitler’s defeat was imminent.
He ended up murdering his wife, Eva Braun, and
killing himself. Absolute power corrupts and leads to very
disappointing conclusions that affect many lives.
Imagine a parent who becomes an absolute dictator in the home.
The parental dictator believes he or she knows what is best for
the family. The spouse and children are out to lunch. The spouse
greatly desires to co-parent, making decisions together, but is
forbidden the opportunity to do so because of a lack of
cooperation, apathy, insults, abuse, or threats of divorce often
used by parental dictators. Imagine the children becoming angry,
depressed, and possibly dabbling in inappropriate activities as
an act of rebellion against the dominant tyrant in the home.
Imagine the spouse of the dictator retreating into his or her
own world in order to cope with the harsh reality of living
behind the iron curtain where the fear
of being shot discourages scaling the wall to escape. This is
not an environment that anyone would want to live in whether it
is a communist country or an extremely dysfunctional family.
Finally, imagine watching another movie on TV about some kid
that shoots his father because of a history of physical abuse
toward himself and his mother. How about a TV show depicting an
abused woman who sets her husband’s bed on fire as a desperate
act to escape. Unfortunately these events have happened and, as
previously mentioned, absolute power corrupts and leads to very
disappointing conclusions. There is a better way. Keep on
reading.
4. Families need to be ordered, structured
and have a hierarchy of authority. Authority flows downward
within families - not upward (i.e., Children must learn to
respect authority - parents, teachers, police, clergy, etc.).
Without repeating the obvious, I will assume that you have
thoroughly read the proceeding philosophical underpinnings. I
was taught in some of my social work and psychology classes that
the ideal family system is a democratic one (i.e., King Arthur's
round table). Everyone has an equal say and equal vote. The
philosophy of democratic parenting was also promoted in some
treatment environments where I worked. I was young and
idealistic when I first entered the mental health profession. My
instructors certainly knew better than what my parents
demonstrated for me while I was growing up. Therefore, I
attempted to help families learn and practice the democratic
model of parenting. There was only one problem. It never worked.
Parents quickly became frustrated because common sense told them
they should have authority and power in the home, but these so
called educated clinicians, including myself, were telling them
to parent differently. I remember parents yelling at me about
how their kids were going to get away with murder if they
actually practiced this model of democratic parenting. They
would tell me, “You’re undermining our parental authority!” I
would look at them with a patronizing smile and gently encourage
them to defy common sense and practice democratic parenting.
Again, it never worked. At this time, I would like to extend a
thousand apologies to those families, as should any clinician
that promotes the democratic model of parenting. Elevating personal
ideology over the practical realities of life and good
behavioral science is self-serving and morally reprehensible.
Fortunately, I was exposed to working in other therapeutic
treatment environments where democratic parenting was not
practiced. Instead, parents were encouraged to take control of
their home by becoming benevolent dictators –
not absolute dictators. In
other words, parents were encouraged to lovingly assert their
authority and seek compliance from their children concerning
their parental values and morals. Although parents were directed
to listen to their child’s thoughts and feelings concerning
various issues with a sensitive ear, ultimately, the parents had
the final say. There were only two votes – dad’s and mom’s.
Children were taught that their parents were in charge and they
needed to learn how to submit to their parents’ authority, as
well as submitting to the authority of other adults at school,
church, synagogue, and in the community. I began to see the
benefits of behavior modification and how its techniques were
used successfully to gain compliance from children toward
parents and other authority figures.
Eventually, I began to “beg, borrow, and steal” various concepts
of behavior modification from my experiences working in
different therapeutic settings and from behavioral research. As
a result, FAMILY Rules was
born. Occasionally, I’ll have parents in my office who want help
getting their adolescent’s attitudes and behaviors under
control, but they want me to teach them the model of democratic
parenting. I flat out refuse to teach them this model and offer
FAMILY Rules as
a successful alternative. Sometimes, I
have to refer these passive parents
to another counselor who
will coddle them as they stroll down their unsuccessful
ideological path. However, most other parents will
reluctantly try to learn and implement FAMILY Rules in
their home. Some parents have heard success stories from their
friends about FAMILY Rules and
become eagerly willing to try it in their own home. Sometimes,
I’ll receive a letter or a phone call from these reluctant
parents extending appreciation for my sticking to my guns and
refusing to teach them the democratic model
of parenting. They
often share many examples of positive changes in their family
due to the correct and consistent implementation of FAMILY Rules (i.e.,
“the two ‘C’ words”). You will read about some of their
stories later in Chapter 12.
5. A parent’s primary responsibility is to
prepare their child(ren)
for the “real world” which is ordered, structured and requires a
healthy respect for authority.
If
the real world is ordered, structured and requires a healthy
respect for authority, then why on earth would parents want to
teach their children that these realities don’t matter? These
kinds of parents are doing their children
and the community a great disservice. They are setting their
children up for a lifetime of hardship and failure. Parents must
take the time, and it does take time, to teach their children
correctly and consistently that the real world has rules,
regulations, laws, policies, and procedures. These rules need to
be obeyed because breaking them can result in unemployment,
prison, divorce, or death. Parents are doing their children and
community a great service when they teach their children a
healthy respect for authority. This is adequate preparation for
the real world. This is how you train up a child in the
way they should go.
Unfortunately, some adults are unwilling to change their own bad habits
or take the necessary time to correctly and consistently
discipline their children. I have worked with some parents who
fear taking the reigns of
control away from their children because of possible resulting
tension, conflict,
and rebellion. I try to help them understand that they should
fear what will happen to their children if they don’t put their
foot down now. Their
child may wind up
strung out on drugs, living on the streets, selling their
bodies, incarcerated in a youth facility, or dead. Fear of the
unknown can be paralyzing for many parents.
Speaking of
fear, a healthy respect for authority requires reverent fear.
Some therapists, especially those utilizing the democratic model
of parenting, will argue against parents utilizing reverent fear
as one of their parenting intervention strategies. However, fear
is not always a bad thing. Reverent fear of consequences for bad
or dangerous choices is good. There is an Old Testament verse
that goes something like this, “The fear of God is the beginning
of wisdom and only a fool despises discipline.” I believe this
verse conveys the truth that only a Silly Billy would tell God
and his commandments to take a hike. On the other hand, those
who are wise will listen to and obey God. They fear God’s
consequences if they don’t obey. There is a verse in the New
Testament that goes something like this, “Perfect love casts out
fear.” I believe this verse conveys the truth that eventually an
individual will want to listen to and obey God. Over time, he or
she eventually realizes that God’s commandments were given as an
act of love. God’s commandments protect us from harm rather than
act as a list of divine rules to ruin our day. In the same way,
children who are correctly and consistently disciplined by their
parents eventually realize that their parents’ discipline is an
act of love - not as an attempt to ruin their children’s lives.
Finally, there's a verse in the New Testament that goes
something like this, "We love Him because He first loved us."
In the same way, children eventually mature from a reverent
fear-based model of decision making to a love-based model of
decision making (i.e., "Our children love us because we first
loved them by taking the necessary steps to teach them and to
keep them safe"). However, if you're under the belief that
children can pop out of the chute and naturally begin their
life's journey from a love-based model without you taking the
time to train them up in the way they should go (i.e., utilizing
rewards and consequences) so when they're older, they won't
depart from it, then you're just being a Silly Billy.
An
example of reverent fear being good would be teaching your
toddlers not to run around in the parking lot at the grocery
store. If they do, they might have an appointment with the
time-out chair, or worse yet, they
might become a
parking lot pancake. Another example would involve teaching your
adolescent children that they are not going to curse at their
teachers, get into fights at school, or
go to parties and get drunk or high. If they do, they will
endure consequences at home they will live to regret. These
consequences do not involve physical abuse and/or prolonged
torture. Children who respect and reverently fear authority at
home will respect and reverently fear authority away from home.
The bottom line is, regardless of what some well-intended mental
health professionals think, fear is a part of life and helps to
make the world go round. Without fear, we would be in a heap of
trouble. Years ago, when a friend and I were walking along a
path adjacent to the
Russian River in Alaska, we rounded a corner and ran right into
a grizzly bear. The bear was only five feet away from us. The
grizzly bear’s face looked shocked and I’m pretty sure our faces
looked the same too. I guarantee it! The grizzly bear turned
around and ran about fifty feet
and so did we in the opposite direction. Then the bear stood on it’s hind
legs to look over the brush to see what we were doing. We waved
our hands up high
in the air and yelled and screamed. We were hoping to scare the
bear away. Unfortunately, this grizzly bear had an attitude
problem. He growled, dropped
down on all four legs, and charged right at us. We were armed
only with our fishing poles.
My
friend started to run and I grabbed his shoulder and told him,
“Walk fast but don’t run! You’ll kick in the
bear’s instinct to
chase it’s prey!”
I followed behind my
friend, maintaining a brisk pace, while the grizzly bear
followed behind me down the path. Fear is good! Every time I
looked over my shoulder to see if the grizzly bear was still
behind us, he would growl and charge at me. I prayed like I
never prayed before. Fear is good! We continued our brisk pace
back to the trailhead that originally brought us down to the
river. I looked over my shoulder again. The grizzly bear growled
and charged again. I prayed. Fear is good!Finally, we reached
the bottom of the hill. The grizzly bear was gone. Now, I was
really scared. Where was the bear now? Fear is really good! We
ran up the hill to my truck and climbed in back of it. Our
hearts were pounding and we both were thanking God that we went
to the bathroom before we walked down that trail to the Russian
River.
Two days later, while
eating breakfast; I
read in the Anchorage
Daily News that
the Fish and Game officers had to shoot the same grizzly bear
because he was charging other fishermen. The grizzly bear was
trying to intimidate the fishermen in order to get them to drop
their fish. He wanted an easy free meal. Unfortunately for the
grizzly bear, he lost his fear of man. He was starting to
physically bump into them to increase his intimidation.
Therefore, he had to be shot. Fear is good! Fear makes the world
go round. If we lose our fear, we get into big trouble. Parents
need to teach this reality to their children. Today, unfortunately, many
children and adolescents lack reverent fear of parents,
teachers, police, clergy, and God.
6. Written rules help to clarify
expectations which ultimately increases compliance and decreases
inappropriate behaviors for most individuals.
Let’s face it. Everywhere we go on the planet, rules, laws,
regulations, treaties, policies and procedures are written down.
They help us know how to behave with one another. Written
rules act as a legal, ethical, and/or social contract between
individuals, institutions, and governments. If
these written standards are not complied with, then people lose
their jobs, go to prison, pay penalties and interest, or work
off community service hours. Nations might even go to war if a
treaty is broken.
The rules are written down at schools, churches, synagogues,
work, clubs, governments, bars, and even on airplanes.
Every institution on the planet has taken the time to develop
and post written rules, except
the most important institution in the world - the family. In the
family, most parents have the rules listed in their minds only.
Mom has a list of rules floating around inside her head and dad
has a list of rules floating around inside his head. Some of
these rules overlap in agreement; however, mom has rules that
dad doesn’t know about, or he does know about them and he doesn’t
like them. Likewise, dad has a list of rules floating
around inside his
head that mom doesn’t know about, or she does know about them
and she doesn’t like them either. This common scenario in most
homes leads to great tension and conflict between spouses as
well as between parents and their children.
The fact that most parents don’t write down their rules for the
family often causes their children to conduct Vulcan mind-melds
to obtain the rules from their parents’ brains. In other words,
many children have to guess at what will or won’t please their
parents each day. Whether
or not certain rules will be enforced may depend on one or both
parent’s mood and energy levels. How
confusing for the kids! Parents are supposed to prepare their
children for living in the real world. Doesn’t it make sense
that the rules at home should be written down just like
everywhere else on the planet? Who can argue against plain old
common sense? Oops! I spoke too soon.
I
once talked with a therapist who I will refer to as Clyde. He
did not see the value in writing down the rules in the home.
Clyde wanted to see the research to back up my philosophical
statement: “Written rules help to clarify expectations which
ultimately increases compliance and decreases inappropriate
behaviors for most individuals.” Well, first things first. I
informed Clyde that a former psychology instructor of mine once
stated during a statistics lecture, “Good research often
confirms common sense to be true” or “What everyone pretty much
already knew to be true is actually true.” Secondly, I reminded
Clyde that everywhere we go on the planet, important rules,
laws, regulations, treaties, policies and procedures are written
down. It is a way of life for all institutions, micro and macro,
to help clarify expectations via appropriate communication. In
other words, written rules help all
of us to stay on the
same page.
Finally, I informed the skeptical therapist, Clyde, that if
writing down the rules was good enough for the State Division of
Occupational Licensing (SDOL) as well as God, then it was good
enough for me. Clyde responded, “What do you mean by that?” I
responded, “If the SDOL thought it was important enough to
specifically spell out in a handbook what it takes to obtain or
lose a license to work in the mental health field, then it is
good enough for me. Also, if God thought it was important enough
to have the Old and New Testaments recorded, including the Ten
Commandments, in order to clarify His expectations for the human
race and to increase our
compliance with His
standards, then it is good enough for me today. I’ll use the
same method with my children in our home.” It’s amazing
how I see parents and professionals alike scramble in their
minds while they try to deny the reality of this simple truth.
But wait, there’s more.
I
explored further why Clyde was being so apprehensive about
something that made absolute common sense. He shared his
personal preference to “fly by the seat of my pants” without
having to adhere to much order and structure. Clyde wasn’t used to
imposed boundaries and accountability and often, unknowingly,
violated the boundaries of others. When boundaries were
clarified for Clyde, he would become angry and oppositional. I
wonder why Clyde was skeptical? Perhaps
some unresolved issues were interfering there, huh? Clyde didn’t
want to be confused by the reality of common sense. The scary
thing is that there are therapists like Clyde out there who
unknowingly mess up your kids. I meant “work” with your kids.
Although they truly mean well, they’re only throwing fuel on the
fire of adolescent rebellion via their own errant ideology.
Before I explain how the parenting system works to children and
adolescents, I often share the following analogy with them in my
private practice or at my FAMILY Rules seminars.
I ask them to imagine how they would think and feel if they woke
up the next morning and read in the newspaper, watched on TV or
heard on the radio that the governor of their state had stepped
down from office. In addition, the state legislature had
suspended itself and all state law. There were
no more local, county, or
state police, the military bases were closed, and everyone was
released from jail and prison. Most kids look shocked and tell
me that they would feel very afraid of what others might do to
them and their families. Naturally, there are always a few
oppositional kids that say something like, “Cool!” I always
respond by saying, “Cool, huh? So it would be cool if Joe Schmoe comes
by your house, blows your dad away, slices your mothers throat,
rapes and tortures you before burning you alive in your home,
after, of course, looting your home for all the money and
valuables they can find?”
Even the most oppositional children are eventually willing to
concede that written rules help to protect all of us from others
as well as ourselves. Defiant children are used to living by a
double standard and they don’t like having it pointed out to
them. They want to
have everyone else follow
the rules, but they don’t want to live under the same
obligation. Oppositional children want their parents to care for
them by providing food, clothing, shelter, education, and
medical attention. However, they also want to come and go as
they please, drink alcohol
and use illicit drugs,
smoke, skip school, cheat, steal, have sex, and have the right
to treat others rudely. They want to be masters of their own
destiny and live by their own set of rules, even if their rules
violate the rules in their home, school, church, synagogue,
and/or community. Basically, they want their cake and the
freedom to eat it, too. Well, I’m sorry, but that’s not going to
happen as long as “Dr. J” is alive and well. That would be me. I
work with parents to clarify their expectations through written
rules. In the long run, my experience has been that written
rules help to increase compliance with parental expectations.
This is especially true when the written rules and subsequent
rewards and consequences are implemented correctly and
consistently (i.e., “the two ‘C’ words).
Now that you
have finished reading through the six philosophical
underpinnings of FAMILY, let’s quickly review the six statements
in bold italic print:
1. The “real world” is ordered and
structured and the lack of order and structure results in chaos.
2. A hierarchy of authority and a healthy
respect for it is a vital part of making order and structure
work effectively.
3. Authority flows downward; however,
without checks, balances, and feedback there is an increased
risk of developing an absolute dictatorship (i.e., Absolute
power corrupts - ask Adolph Hitler).
4. Families need to be ordered, structured
and have a hierarchy of authority. Authority flows downward
within families - not upward (i.e., Children must learn to
respect authority - parents, teachers, police, clergy, etc.).
5. A parent’s primary responsibility is to
prepare their child(ren)
for the “real world” which is ordered, structured and requires a
healthy respect for authority.
6. Written rules help to clarify
expectations which ultimately increases compliance and decreases
inappropriate behaviors for most individuals.
If
you agree with the philosophical underpinnings of FAMILY Rules,
please continue to read this book. If you don’t agree with the
philosophical underpinnings of FAMILY Rules,
please read through
them again. If after
reading this section for a second time, you still don’t agree
with the philosophical underpinnings of FAMILY Rules,
please give this book to someone else who will benefit from
reading it. This is America and you have the freedom to raise
your children the way you want to. However, please ask them not
to run for the office of the President of the United States. We
need respectful leaders who understand the way the real world
works.
Important Definitions in order to Understand
FAMILY Rules
Throughout the
years, I occasionally hear parents say something like, “This
FAMILY Rules system
of yours sure sounds awfully rigid to me. I’m not sure if
something like this will help us with our family problems.”
Although they were correct in implying that rigidity would not
help their family through troubled times, they were incorrect in
their assumptions that FAMILY Rules is
a rigid system. FAMILY Rules is
a flexible system. It is a living and breathing document. The
rules are not chiseled in stone. The list of rules can be added
to, deleted from, or modified at anytime. I’ll explain more
about this later in chapter eight. FAMILY Rules provides
order and structure for parents pertaining to their already
existing rules and disciplinarian intervention strategies.
FAMILY Rules doesn’t
offer much of anything new. Instead, it helps to organize and
structure what parents are already trying
to do, but in a much
more effective way.
Let’s take a
closer look at a few key definitions that contribute to the
philosophical underpinnings of FAMILY:
Order - 1. A
condition of logical or coherent arrangement among the
individual elements of a group. 2.
A. A condition of standard or prescribed arrangement among
component parts, such that proper functioning or appearance is
achieved. B. Systematic arrangement and design. 3. A. The
established organization or structure of society. B.
The rule of law and custom or the observance of prescribed
procedure (Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 2008).
Simply put,
FAMILY Rules offers
parents a logical arrangement for their family. It helps
facilitate clear expectations and standards in order to achieve
proper family functioning and appearance. FAMILY Rules,
by design, is systematic in its arrangement. FAMILY Rules helps
prepare children for the established organization and structure
of society. Children learn the rule of law and custom and how to
observe prescribed procedures at home, school, church,
synagogue, and in their community. Order is good. Order is not
rigid. FAMILY Rules is
ordered - not rigid.
Let’s take a look at another key definition that is a
significant building block in the philosophical underpinnings of
FAMILY Rules:
Structure - 1. Something
made up of a number of parts held or put together in a specific
way. 2. The manner in which parts are arranged or combined to
form a whole. 3. Interrelation of parts in a complex entity. 4.
Relatively intricate or extensive organization. 5. To give form
or arrangement to. (Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary,
2008).
FAMILY Rules assists
parents by organizing their values and morals (i.e., expectations)
in a specific way that forms a whole system of family structure.
The system gives form or arrangement to what is often identified
as “flying by the seat of their pants” (i.e., “parenting by
ear”). Quite often, parents cross their fingers and pray that
their children will survive adolescence. With FAMILY Rules,
parents can take a proactive positive
approach instead of “parenting by ear.” FAMILY Rules helps them organize
and structure their approach to parenting. No more “flying by
the seat of your pants” or “playing it by ear.”
Just for the fun of it, let’s take a peek at the definition for
rigid/rigidity. Since some parents think there is a possibility
that FAMILY Rules might
be too rigid for them, they should at least try and understand
what rigid really means. The definition is as follows:
Rigid/Rigidity -
1. Not bending:
INFLEXIBLE. 2. Not moving: Stationary. 3. Difficult. Synonyms:
stiff, unbending, unyielding. Core meaning: not changing shape
or bending (rigid iron bars). (Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate
Dictionary, 2008).
FAMILY Rules is
anything but rigid. If
you haven’t figured it out by now while reading up
to this point in my book, then you
will have it figured out by the end of the book. As
previously stated, FAMILY Rules is
flexible and is a living and breathing document. It is not
chiseled in stone. As long as both parents are in agreement,
they can add rules, delete rules, and/or modify existing rules
anytime they want to.
Once again, order and structure are not the same as
rigid/rigidity. FAMILY Rules provides
order and structure but it is not rigid. FAMILY Rules is
a living and breathing document that can change over time. It
bends, it’s flexible, it moves, it’s easy, and it changes shape
as needed. If you’re still thinking that FAMILY Rules is
rigid, it is because you lack a proper understanding of the
previous definitions and how they differ from one another.
Structure and order are healthy and necessary to make the “real
world” and families run smoothly. If you still can’t see this,
there is a serious possibility
that you may have unresolved issues from your past with
authority, structure and discipline that are interfering with
your present ability to rationally perceive what I’m trying to
convey. Consider addressing these issues in therapy before
implementing any kind of parenting program.
Now, before we move on to the next chapter, we need to take a
quick peek at a couple more definitions. FAMILY Rules utilizes
consequences for bad behaviors (e.g., Good Habit Cards), as well
as rewards for good behaviors (e.g., Daily Tokens
and RAK chips). Every once in awhile, I have a parent say the
following concerning the rewards aspect of the system: “You’re
asking me to bribe my kid to behave. I shouldn’t have to bribe
my kid to do the right thing!” I couldn’t agree more with the
concerned parent. The very definition of the word, “bribe,”
means something completely different than the understanding the
concerned parent is conveying. Bribe is defined as follows:
Bribe - 1. Something,
as money or a favor, offered or given to someone in a position
of trust to induce him or her to act dishonestly
(Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 2008).
The FAMILY Rules
parenting system
would never encourage parents to offer money or a favor to their
children to induce them to act dishonestly. Quite the contrary,
FAMILY Rules encourages honest
behaviors and seeks to move children in a positive direction
toward conforming to their parents’ values and morals (i.e.,
expectations). I would never ask a parent to bribe their child.
Reward their child, yes. Bribe their child - absolutely
not!
Since the “R” word was brought up (i.e., reward), maybe we
should take a quick peek at what the definition truly means:
Reward -
1. Something,
as money given or offered especially for a special service
[i.e., involving honest behavior]. 2.
A satisfying result (Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary,
2008).
Clearly, FAMILY Rules encourages
parents to reward, not bribe, their children for their good
behaviors which bring about satisfying results for everyone
involved. Happy children make for happy parents. Happy parents
make for happy children. It’s a never ending circle of familial
bliss which is certainly better than the other conflictual option
which many families experience.
In
summary, compensating your children for good behaviors is not
bribery. Adults are rewarded in their jobs by receiving
paychecks, bonuses, awards, trips, raises, tips, promotions,
recognition by the company, the
coveted parking space near the front door, and
other possible benefits. Likewise, children are rewarded for
good behaviors by their parents. This is appropriate preparation
for the real world. You’ll never ever insist that your employer
stop rewarding you for your good hard efforts on the job.
Likewise, go therefore to your domicile and bless the buns of
the fruit of your loins or womb (i.e., reward your children when
they do well).